This blog is being typed with hot and angry
hands. Not because my kids have poured my favourite perfume down the sink or
cleaned our new car with rocks, it’s because I have just read an article on
adoption in the Daily Mail. I am furious. Have you read this tripe? http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2140586/Scandal-babies-parents-wont-adopt-theyre-called-Chrystal-Chardonnay.html
You see, what if you were/are a prospective
adopter, someone who has struggled with fertility perhaps or is simply thinking
about it as a way to create your family, this article could stop you in your
tracks. I’m furious because it’s so bloody inaccurate! Local authorities and
agencies do sometimes have their own ways of working and can be mildly
different from each other but they all have to adhere to the same guidelines
and I think I understand enough about it to be able to rant in this blog.
I am an adoption panel member for a local
authority and have been for two years. I read those very heavy yellow pages
sets of papers and help the panel come to a decision every month. If a child
with an unusual or highly recognisable name comes up then sometimes we actively
recommend they consider a change to protect the child’s identity. If you’re
talking about a baby, you can introduce a new name gently and they will become
used to it. Obviously get a 4 year old with a tricky name then it needs more consideration
but you are adopting a person, a child, not a name that will embarrass you when
you enrol them at baby yoga. The article was so unashamedly aimed at the middle
classes it was thoroughly insulting to many who have considered adoption or
have adopted. Your children’s friends don’t have to be called William and
Henry!
This was badly researched, highly
sensationalist, wholly inaccurate and actually damaging. The girl called
Chardonnay they talked about in the article is, in my opinion, very likely to
be fine and will find a loving family who will give her a tremendous life. They
are playing us, the readers. Pulling our heartstrings and trying to get us to
think the whole process is in ruins and best avoided. Well I can tell you it is
not.
If you want to do you have to go for it. The
process is nothing like as bad as they say it is. Read my previous blogs to
find out what I think about that. As for letterbox contact, well, I don’t like
it and don’t agree it’s beneficial for any party but still, their view is
wrong. Children never get to write directly to their parents. Ever. It’s like
prison mail and gets checked before being passed on. The Daily Mail is putting
frighteners on people.
There. I said it. I said it quickly and with
a hot head. This might not be my finest blog but it is one of the most
passionate. Now I’m going to watch a DVD with my beautiful children and try and
forget all about the Daily Mail. You should too.
And you say so eloquently (even in anger ;))what so many adopters are thinking. We had a Twitter chat about this yesterday and the general consensus was one of annoyance. I personally found the comments insulting and cursory in nature. I hope it doesn't put people off. Thank you for posting this.
ReplyDeleteI've been unable to organise my many angry, offended and upset thoughts enough to write them down. Thank you for doing it for me, and so eloquently!
ReplyDeleteWe don't call it the daily hate mail for nothing. No matter the subject they are likely to be dangerously inacurate and damaging
ReplyDeleteI read this article and circulated it in anger on FB and Twitter. I couldn't bring myself to comment on it as I was too angry and it was too inappropriate. There are insufficient adopters enough in this country without targetting the ones who do put themselves through the gambit to get through the adoption process and actually become adopters. We actually don't have any friends called "William" and "Harry" and even if we did, what does that matter?
ReplyDeleteYou're absolutely right. It was an infuriating article that is 100% inaccurate. I'm glad I wasn't the only one to feel annoyed about it! Hopefully it will be forgotten and not put anyone off.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your comment.
I was furious when this article was published by the Daily Fail. Sensationalist journalism as is par for the course for this paper.
ReplyDelete